Recommender Questions for Programs that start in 2025

Important Notes
It is essential that you check the school website for the most accurate, complete and up-to-date information.
Especially if you are a re-applicant.

The recommenders should work on the official form, either hardcopy, or online. They should not go by the information contained on this page alone.

Sometimes schools change the questions mid-season, so be aware, and have your recommenders be aware they should verify the questions before submitting their answers.

Pay attention to the word limits.

Sign Up For a Free Consultation

Something changed? Any comments? Please update us: mistake@ARINGO.com

Instructions

We strongly prefer that MBA candidates provide both letters from current or former employers. If you do not provide a letter from your current direct supervisor, you should include an explanation in the Supplementary Data section of the online application.
Please only submit two letters of recommendation. Recommendations may be submitted online or through the mail using a PDF version. You will receive an automated message once a recommender has submitted their letter of recommendation. Letters sent via mail must have the letter writer’s signature across the seal of the envelope.
If your recommender is not comfortable writing a letter in English, it is acceptable to obtain the recommendation in the native language of the author. The original letter and an English translation completed by an ATA (American Translators Association) certified translator must be provided through the mail with the letter writer’s signature across the seal of the envelope.
You are responsible for ensuring that the recommendation is submitted prior to the application deadline. Please do not draft or write your own letter of recommendation, even if asked to do so by your recommender. This can result in denial of your application or withdrawal of your offer of admission.

QUESTIONS

Section 1: Recommender Information

Thank you for agreeing to write a recommendation for the applicant for admissions to the Haas Full-time MBA Program at the Haas School of Business. We encourage you to be completely candid and to provide specific examples whenever possible. It is helpful to the applicant if you answer the specific questions that we ask. Generic recommendations that do not address our questions typically do not strengthen an application. We greatly appreciate the time and effort that you are taking to provide us with your assessment of the applicant’s abilities.

  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Organization
  • Work Location (Country)
  • Position/Title
  • Relationship
  • Industry
  • Telephone
  • Email Address

Section 2: Leadership Assessment Grid

In this section, you will find 12 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories: – Achievement – Influence – People – Personal Qualities – Cognitive Abilities For each competency, please select the one button that corresponds to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of needed development. Your candid and honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors described in the previous level.

ACHIEVEMENT

Initiative
Acts ahead of need/ anticipates problems

Results Orientation
Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement

INFLUENCE

Communication, Professional Impression & Poise
Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm and measured even in time of crisis or conflict.

Influence and Collaboration
Engages and works with people over whom he/she has no direct control

PEOPLE

Respect for Others
Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions

Team Leadership
Manages and empowers a team of direct reports or peers on project based teams (includes virtual teams)

Developing Others
Helps people develop their performance and ability over time

PERSONAL QUALITIES

Trustworthiness/Integrity
Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs or intentions

Adaptability/Resilience
Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure

Self-Awareness
Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses

COGNITIVE ABILITIES

Strategic Orientation
Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work

Problem Solving
Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution

Is there anything about your ratings on which you would like to comment? (Optional) (textbox)

Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this applicant compared to her/ his peer group? (select)

Overall, I… (select)

SECTION 3. RECOMMENDATION QUESTIONS

1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (Up to 50 words) (textbox)

2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (Up to 500 words) (textbox)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Up to 500 words) (textbox)

4. Is there anything else we should know? (Optional) (textbox)

We strongly prefer that you use this form for your recommendation. Alternatively, you may upload a letter of recommendation. (upload file)

Instructions

Please submit letters of recommendation from two individuals who know you well and can offer specific examples of your performance at and contributions to an organization. Avoid choosing recommenders based on their title or status. We are more concerned with content and substance rather than reputation.

One letter of recommendation should come from a supervisor. We are looking for objectivity in the letter, and we want to hear from someone who can assess both your strengths and your weaknesses.

We prefer to hear from a current supervisor, although we understand that this may not be possible. If you are unable to ask your current supervisor, please explain the circumstances in the optional essay.
If you work for a family business or own your own company, please submit a letter from a client or outside party who does business with you and can provide an objective assessment.
The other letter can come from another professional contact or from someone who has worked with you in an organization or club, or on a volunteer project. This letter can offer a different perspective on your skill sets outside of your professional environment.

We have no preference regarding who supplies your second letter of recommendation.
Our only guideline is that it should add new and valuable insight to your candidacy.
How to Submit Letters of Recommendation
The recommendation form is part of the online application. You will be prompted to provide the names and email addresses of your recommenders, and we’ll send them an email directing them to the online form. Chicago Booth does not accept letters of recommendation via mail or fax.

We require every applicant to provide two letters of recommendation. These letters MUST be submitted via our online system. To ensure the objectivity and validity of your recommendations, the written product must be entirely your recommenders’ work. Although you may discuss the recommendations with them, you may not have any involvement in drafting or submitting them.
One letter should come from a current supervisor, who can assess both your strengths and your weaknesses. If you are unable to ask your current supervisor, please explain below. The other letter can come from another professional contact or from someone who has worked with you in an organization or club, or on a volunteer project.
Note: Once you submit a recommender’s information, an email with instructions will be sent to the recommender.

QUESTIONS

Reference Information

  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Title
  • Company Name
  • Industry
  • Contact Information
  • Country
  • Street
  • City
  • State
  • Postal Code
  • Email Address:
  • Phone Number:
  • Reference Relationship: (select)
  • How long have you known the applicant? __________
  • Do you have an MBA degree? (select)
  • Are you in any way affiliated with The University of Chicago or Chicago Booth? (select)

Skills Assessment

Please assess the candidate’s skills in the following areas. Your honest and candid assessment greatly helps the Admissions Committee in evaluating the candidate.
Most candidates will have a range of marks; it is rare for a candidate to exceed expectations in all areas.

For each skill, select: Unable to Assess ; Area of Concern ; Opportunity for Development ; Solid/Meets Expectations ; Strength/Exceeds Expectations ; Ability to adapt to change

  • Self-awareness/Maturity
  • Openness to feedback and constructive criticism
  • Interpersonal skills with colleagues/subordinates
  • Interpersonal skills with superiors/executives
  • Confidence
  • Initiative/Self-motivation
  • Collaboration/Teamwork
  • Critical thinking and problem solving skills
  • Respect for diverse perspectives
  • Capacity to lead

Peer Comparison

  • Based on your professional experience, how does the applicant rate within his or her peer group? (select)
  • Please indicate the reference group for this comparison: _________
  • Overall, I: (select)

Letter of Recommendation

Please provide a written letter of recommendation in support of the applicant addressing the following questions:

1. How do the applicant’s performance, potential, background, or personal qualities compare to those of other well-qualified candidates in similar roles? Please provide specific examples.

2. Please describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response.

(upload file)

INSTRUCTIONS

First-time applicants require one recommendation. Reapplicants are required to submit one new recommendation. If you have been working full-time for at least six months, your recommendation should ideally be from your current supervisor. If you are unable to secure a recommendation from your direct supervisor, please submit a statement of explanation in the Employment section of your application. Beyond your direct supervisor, other recommender options include: a former direct supervisor or another professional associate, senior to you, who can share their insights on your candidacy.

If you have worked full-time for fewer than six months, your recommendation should be from a person who can comment on your managerial abilities. You may ask a summer employer or another person whom you feel can objectively assess your professional promise. If you are a college senior, we encourage you to apply for the Deferred Enrollment Program.

Please note that Columbia Business School and several of our peer institutions use similar, if not identical, recommendation questions. This is an effort on our part to make the process easier for your recommender. We expect that you, the applicant, will not participate in the drafting of your recommendation. When entering contact information for recommenders, please use their institutional or professional email address. We ask that the recommender upload their recommendation on letterhead, whenever possible. References submitted from personal or anonymous email accounts (e.g. Gmail, Yahoo, 123.com, 163.com, qq.com etc.) will be subject to your admission being rescinded if significant discrepancies are found. Applications are not considered complete until all required information is submitted; this includes your recommendation.

Please enter information for one individual you wish to submit a recommendation on your behalf. They should be able to speak directly about your performance and professional promise.

If you have been working full-time for at least six months, your recommendation should ideally be from your current supervisor. If you are unable to secure a recommendation from your direct supervisor, please add a statement of explanation in the Employment section of your application. Beyond your direct supervisor, other recommender options include: a former direct supervisor or another professional associate, senior to you, who can share their insights on your candidacy.

For applicants with family business, entrepreneurial, or non-traditional backgrounds, you may submit a recommendation from a former supervisor or a client. Letters may not be submitted from family members.

Recommendations- Read more about recommendations on our website.
Please note:

We expect that you, the applicant, will not participate in the drafting or submitting of your recommendation. The relationship to your recommender should be accurate.
The letter of recommendation should be on professional letterhead whenever possible.
Please enter your recommender’s institutional or professional email address. If a personal email address is used, please use the optional essay section to provide the reasoning.
Applications are not considered complete until all required information is submitted; this includes your recommendation.
Reapplicants must provide an updated letter of recommendation. It is recommended, but not required, that this new recommendation be from a new recommender who can provide additional insights on your candidacy.
Make sure that you and your recommender adjust spam filters to allow emails from apply@gsb.columbia.edu.
If admitted, your recommender will be contacted by Re Vera Services, LLC to verify the authenticity of the letter of recommendation. Inaccurate information will necessitate a supplemental review, and offers of admission may be rescinded if significant discrepancies are found.

QUESTIONS

Recommender Information

  • Prefix
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Organization
  • Position/Title
  • Industry
  • Relationship
  • Email
  • Telephone

If the candidate enrolls in Columbia Business School’s MBA program, you will be contacted, via the email provided, by Re Vera Services, LLC, who will verify the authenticity of your recommendation. Re Vera Services requires your city, state, and country to assist in their verification process.

  • Country
  • City
  • State

Business Card Upload

Please provide your current business card. If you don’t have a business card, please submit another form of proof of employment. Examples: Screenshot of a profile on an internal company website, link to profile on public company website, etc.

MBA Information

Do you have an MBA? (select)

Recommendation Upload

Please consider the following guidelines when writing your recommendation:

1. How do the candidate’s performance, potential, background, or personal qualities compare to those of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples.

2. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response.

Limit your recommendation to 1000 words. Please submit your recommendation as a PDF or Word document on letterhead, if possible. Thank you once again.
(Upload file)

The letter I submit here is my own work.
(check) I acknowledge

INSTRUCTIONS

You will need to have two recommendations submitted online by the application deadlines. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that all recommendations are submitted online by the deadline date for the round in which the applicant is applying.

Use your best judgment on who you decide to ask – there is no set formula for who should be your recommenders. We know it is not always possible to have a direct supervisor write your recommendation – we would not want you to jeopardize your current position for the application process. Look at the questions we are asking recommenders to complete. Find people who know you well enough to answer them. This can be a former supervisor, a colleague, or someone you collaborate on an activity outside of work. How well a person knows you should take priority over level of seniority or HBS alumni status.

Recommendations must be completed online.

Please submit two recommendations (no more, no less!) from individuals who can speak directly about your professional performance and promise. Recommendations must be completed online.

Who should I choose to be my recommenders? The Admissions Committee suggests (but does not require) that one recommendation be from your direct supervisor. This is a guideline, not a requirement. We are aware that not all candidates will be able to do this.
The other recommendation should be from someone who can comment on your leadership skills and/or potential; this may be a former supervisor, another professional associate, or even a client (e.g. if you work in your family business or if you are an entrepreneur). In general, we discourage peer recommendations and recommendations from professors but recognize that each applicant brings a different set of experiences. So, please use your best judgment on who you decide to ask – you’ll want to choose people who will help you put your best foot forward.
Worth mentioning here, because we are asked this a lot: No, we don’t give special consideration to recommendations written by HBS alums, and you don’t need to have an HBS recommender to be admitted. (Most admitted students don’t!)

What if my recommender doesn’t submit? We review all submitted applications. It is your responsibility to ensure that we receive all of your application materials, including recommendations.

What if my recommender doesn’t receive an email from HBS? Filling out the information below generates an automated email to your recommender. Sometimes servers (especially those at large companies) reject or block automated emails, which means your recommenders might have trouble receiving the link they needs to complete your recommendation. Have no fear — we can fix this! Send an email to ApplyTech@hbs.edu with your recommender’s name and we’ll get it sorted out.

What if I need to change my recommender? If you need to change your recommender’s email address for any reason, you need to exclude that recommender from consideration and then re-enter the information. If you do so, your recommender will lose whatever work has been entered into the recommendation already, so be careful!

Remember to verify accuracy. Web browsers occasionally auto-fill fields incorrectly. Before submitting the request, please ensure that all information is accurate – and remind your recommenders to do the same!

QUESTIONS

Part 1: Your Information

  • Name
  • Prefix
  • First Name
  • Middle Name
  • Last Name
  • Contact Information
  • Telephone
  • Country
  • Street
  • City
  • State
  • Postal Code
  • Current Employment
  • Organization
  • Position/Title
  • Do you know this applicant from a previous employer?
  • HBS Background – Are you a graduate of the Harvard Business School MBA program?

Part 2: Relationship Context

  • Relationship Type (select)
  • Relationship Context (select)
  • Number of applicants you are recommending to the HBS MBA Program this year: ___

Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, their role in your organization: (textbox, 300 characters)

Part 3: Candidate Evaluation

The MBA Admissions Board would like to learn more about the candidate’s strengths and areas of development. For each attribute, please indicate how you have experienced the candidate. All candidates are growing professionally and therefore some of their attributes are likely to be more developed than others. It is helpful to the Admissions Committee to understand your assessment of the candidate’s relative strengths compared to areas they are actively working to develop. To that end, we ask that you distribute the ratings across the whole grid accordingly.

For each attribute, select: No Basis for Judgment ; Potential Area of Concern ; Developing ; Strong ; Distinctive

Business-Minded

  • Analytical thinking
  • Professional maturity
  • Quantitative skills
  • Verbal communication
  • Written communication

Leadership-Focused

  • Awareness of and respect for others
  • Emotional intelligence
  • Integrity
  • Interpersonal skills with colleagues and subordinates
  • Interpersonal skills with superiors
  • Listening skills
  • Teamwork: engagement and collaboration
  • Teamwork: leadership and development of others

Growth-Oriented

  • Creative problem solving
  • Curiosity
  • Initiative
  • Openness to others’ perspectives
  • Receptiveness to feedback and willingness to change
  • Self-awareness

Please use this space to comment on the ratings you have assigned, elaborating on relative strengths and opportunities for further development. (Required) (textbox, 150 words)

Part 4: Open Response Questions

Please respond to the questions below in a single document.

1. How do the applicant’s performance, potential, background, or personal qualities compare to those of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples. (Recommended: 300 words)

2. Please describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Recommended: 250 words)

3. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know? Please be concise.

(upload file)

INSTRUCTIONS

Please submit two recommendations from individuals who can objectively assess and speak directly about your professional experience and leadership promise.
*Please note: Recommendations are a required part of the Kellogg application and will not be considered complete until received. All recommendations must also be received by the application deadline.
Letters of recommendation provide insight into your experience and accomplishments as a leader through the eyes of someone else.
You’ll need to submit two letters of recommendation for your application to be considered complete. Ideally, one letter should come from a current supervisor or manager. The second should come from someone who can evaluate your professional performance and your managerial/leadership potential (e.g., former supervisor, previous employer, client).
Please choose your recommenders carefully as additional letters of support are neither required nor encouraged.

Current supervisor recommendations

We prefer that one recommendation come from your current supervisor; however, we understand that there are several factors involved in getting a master’s degree. So, with that in mind, if you are not submitting a recommendation from a current supervisor, please select one of the following reasons: (select)

QUESTIONS

Recommender information

  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Organization
  • Position/Title
  • Industry
  • Your relationship to the candidate
  • Phone Number
  • Country
  • City
  • State
  • Postal Code
  • Highest Degree Earned
  • Are you a Kellogg Alumnus?
  • Have known candidate since:
  • Please comment briefly on the context of your interaction with the applicant and their role in your organization. (textbox)
  • What has been the candidate’s most significant contribution to your organization? Provide measurable impact if applicable. (textbox)

Leadership assessment

Listed below you will find a section listing some competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. For each item, please select the response corresponding to the behavior that the candidate most typically exhibits. Your candid, honest appraisal of the candidate will be helpful to the Admissions Committee.

Please assess the candidate on the following skills/qualities. (for each skill, select from drop-down menu)

  • Results Orientation
  • Strategic Orientation
  • Team Leadership
  • Influence and Collaboration
  • Communicating
  • Information Seeking
  • Developing Others
  • Change Leadership
  • Respect for Others
  • Trustworthiness

Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to their peer group? (select)

If needed, please explain any rankings above. (textbox, 250 characters)

Do you recommend this candidate for Kellogg? (select)

Are you willing to speak with an admissions officer about this candidate? (select)

Should the candidate accept an offer of admission, I understand I may be contacted by Re Vera Services as part of the application verification process, via phone and/or email, to verify authenticity of this letter of recommendation. (please type your full legal name)

Recommendation upload

Please address all of the following questions:

1. Kellogg has a diverse student body and values students who are inclusive and encouraging of others with differing perspectives and backgrounds. Please tell us about a time when you witnessed the candidate living these values. (300 words)

2. How does the candidate’s performance compare to those of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples. (300 words)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the candidate. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (250 words)

4. (Optional) Is there anything else you would like us to know?

(Upload file)

INSTRUCTIONS

List one recommender who will complete a reference form in support of your application. Once you click the “Submit Recommendation Request” button below, your recommender will receive an email from ApplyWeb with instructions.
If you are not selecting a direct supervisor as your recommender, please address why in the optional essay.
Please note that a member of the admissions committee or third party vendor may reach out to your recommender to verify their recommendation.
To send the recommendation request email, please click the ‘Submit Recommendation Request’ button below.
If you change your recommender after the initial invitation has been sent, any future recommendation changes will not be reflected in your application form.

Michigan Ross uses the GMAC Common Recommendation Form, and we require only one recommendation. Select a recommender who can discuss your professional performance and work style; a current or former supervisor is ideal. Alternatives include a client, project manager, or professional mentor.

QUESTIONS

Recommender Information

  • Prefix
  • First (Given) Name
  • Middle Name
  • Last (Family) Name/Surname
  • Current Organization
  • Current Position/Title
  • Industry
  • Street Address1
  • Street Address2
  • City
  • State/Province
  • Postal Code
  • Country
  • Day Phone Number (Country code, area code, number)
  • Email
  • (Optional) Alternative Email
    (If you are using your personal email account for this recommendation, please enter your work email address which may be used as a verification of your identity if the applicant is admitted.)
  • Context of Relationship
  • Nature of Relationship
  • How long have you known the applicant?
  • During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant?
  • If you are affiliated with Ross School of Business or University of Michigan, please indicate how.
  • Did you use a translator?

Recommendation Form

Using the grid on the second page of this form, please rate the applicant.
In this section, you will find 12 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories:

  • Achievement
  • Influence
  • People
  • Personal Qualities
  • Cognitive Abilities

For each competency, please mark the one button corresponding to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid, honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.

Achievement

Initiative

No Basis for Judgement
Reluctant to Take on New Tasks, Waits to Be Told What to Do; Defers to Others
Willing to Step in and Take Action When Required to Do So
Takes Charge Spontaneously When Problem Needs Attention
Volunteers for New Work Challenges; Proactively Puts in Extra Effort to Accomplish Critical or Difficult Tasks
Proactively Seeks High-impact Projects; Steps Up to Challenges Even When Things Are Not Going Well

Results Orientation

No Basis for Judgement
Focuses on Fulfilling Activities at Hand; Unsure How Work Relates to Goals
Takes Actions to Overcome Obstacles to Achieve Goals
Independently Acts to Exceed Goals and Plans for Contingencies
Documents Activities and Outcomes to Learn From Past; Introduces Incremental Improvements to Raise the Effectiveness of Team
Invents New Approaches with Measurably Better Results; Works to Deliver Best-in-class Performance Improvements

Influence

Communication and Professional Impression, Poise and Presence

No basis for judgement
Struggles to Get Point Across; Neglects to Understand Audience’s Input or Perspective; Lacks Confidence and Gets Flustered Under Pressure
Works to Get Point Across; Acknowledges Feedback; Reframes Statements When Necessary to Make Them Clearer; Speaks Politely; Remains Composed in Known Circumstances
Present Views Clearly and Logically Structures Content for a Broad Audience; Listens and Responds to Feedback; Prepares in Advance to Appear Confident; Leaves a Positive and Professional Impression; Responds Confidently in Unfamiliar Situations
Uses Tailored Language That Appeals to Specific Groups; Restates What Others Have Said to Check for Understanding; Comes Across as Confident; Responds Rapidly and Strongly to Crisis; Looked to for Advice and Guidance
Structures Content for Senior-level Meetings; Maintains Composure When Challenged; Solicits Opinions and Concerns, Discusses Them Openly and Adjusts Communication; When in Strong Conflict or Crisis, Remains Cool Under Pressure; Channels Strong Emotion Into Positive Action

Influence and Collaboration

No Basis for Judgement
Does Not Seek Input and Perspective of Others
Accepts Input From Others and Engages Them in Problem Solving
Seeks First to Understand Perspectives of Others; Takes Actions to Gain Their Support for Ideas and Initiatives
Uses Tailored Approaches to Connect with Others, Influence, and Achieve Results
Uses Tailored Influence Approaches to Create and Leverage a Network of Strategically Chosen Individuals to Improve Collective Outcomes

People

Respect for Others

No Basis for Judgement
Unwilling to Acknowledge Others’ Points of View
Open to Considering Others’ Views When Confronted or Offered
Invites Input From Others Because of Expressed Respect for Them and Their Views
Praises People Publicly for Their Good Actions; Ensures That Others’ Opinions Are Heard Before Their Own
Uses Empathy and Personal Experience to Resolve Conflicts and Foster Mutual Respect; Reinforces Respect with Public Praise When Individuals Solicit and Use Input From Others

Team Leadership

No Basis for Judgement
Struggles to Delegate Effectively (E.g. Micromanages); Does Not Organize Activities or Provide Appropriate Information to Complete Tasks
Assigns Tasks and Tells People What to Do; Checks When They Are Done
Solicits Ideas and Perspectives From the Team; Structures Activities; Holds Members Accountable
Actively Engages the Team to Develop Plans and Resolve Issues Through Collaboration; Shows the Impact of Individual/team Contributions
Recruits Others Into Duties or Roles Based on Insight Into Individual Abilities; Rewards Those Who Exceed Expectations; Provides Strong Organizational Support

Developing Others

No Basis for Judgement
Focuses Only on One’s Own Growth; Critical of Others’ Efforts to Develop
Encourages People to Develop; Points Out Mistakes to Help People Develop and Praises Them for Improvements
Gives Specific Positive and Negative Behavioral Feedback to Support the Development of Others
Provides Overarching Practical Guiding Principles and Recommendations That Are Applicable in Multiple Situations to Direct or Focus Efforts on Specific Areas of Development
Identifies Potential in Others; Inspires Others to Develop by Providing Feedback, Mentoring/coaching, and Identifying New Growth Opportunities as Well as Supporting Their Effort to Change

Personal Qualities

Trustworthiness/Integrity

No Basis for Judgement
Follows the Crowd; Takes Path of Least Resistance; Gives in Under Pressure
Acts Consistently with Stated Intentions, Values, or Beliefs When It Is Easy to Do So
Acts Spontaneously and Consistently with Stated Intentions, Values, or Beliefs Despite Opposition
Initiates Actions Based on Values or Beliefs Even Though the Actions May Come with Reputational Risk; Demonstrates the Values of the Team or Organization Publicly
Demonstrates High Personal Integrity Even at Personal Cost; Holds People Accountable to the Team or Organizational Values

Adaptability/Resilience

No Basis for Judgement
Prefers Existing Ways of Doing Things; Fears Failure; Becomes Anxious Under Challenging Situations
Adapts to New Methods and Procedures When Required to Do So; Remains Calm in Unfamiliar Situations Until Confronted with Obstacle
Champions Adoption of New Initiatives and Processes; Exhibits Level-headedness in Most Environments Including Challenging Ones; Persists Until Obstacle Is Overcome
Seeks Out Disruptions as an Opportunity for Improvement; Remains Optimistic and Forward-looking in Difficult Situations That May Result in Failure
Energized by Projects with High Uncertainty but Potential for High Reward; Seeks to Be the First Into Unknown or Unfamiliar Situations; Welcomes Learning Opportunities Created by Failure; Learns From Mistakes and Rebounds Quickly From Setbacks

Self Awareness

No Basis for Judgement
Lacks Awareness of How He/She Is Perceived; Denies or Offers Excuses When Confronted
Acknowledges Fault or Performance Problem When Confronted with Concrete Example or Data
Describes Own Key Strengths and Weaknesses Accurately; Welcomes Feedback From Others and Discusses Opportunities to Change with Select Individuals
Actively Seeks Out Feedback to Explicitly Address Desired Improvement Areas or Build on Strengths; Explores Reasons for Problems Openly, Including Own Faults
Seeks Out Challenging and Potentially Risky Experiences to Improve; Identifies and Engages with Resources-people, Processes, or Content-to Maximize Strengths or Mitigate Weaknesses

Cognitive

Problem Solving

No Basis for Judgement
Avoids Problems; When Faced with Problems, Sticks to What Worked Before, or Chooses an Obvious Path
Offers Solutions When the Risk Is Low; Focuses on Immediate, Short-term Implications Instead of the Big Picture
Looks Beyond the Obvious; Identifies and Focuses on the Critical Information Needed to Understand a Problem, Identifies Root Cause(s), and Comes Up with Reasonable Solutions
Gathers and Analyzes Key Information Using Complex Methods or Several Layers Deep; Integrates Perspectives From a Variety of Sources to Arrive at Unexpected but Practical and Effective Solutions
Applies Logic to Break Complex Problems Down Into Manageable Parts or Sub-problems; Solves Tough and Interconnected Problems and Can Explain How the Pieces Are Connected

Strategic Orientation

No Basis for Judgement
Focuses on Completing Work Without Understanding Implications
Understands Immediate Issues or Implications of Work or Analysis
Develops Insights or Recommendations Within Area of Responsibility That Have Improved Near-Term Business Performance
Develops Insights or Recommendations Within Area of Responsibility That Have Shaped Team/organization Strategy and Will Have Impact on Long-term Business Performance
Develops Insights or Recommendations Beyond Area of Responsibility with Impact on Long-term Business Strategy and Performance

(Optional) Is there anything about your rating on the grid categories which you would like to comment? (textbox)

Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this applicant compared to her/his peer group? (select)

Overall, I (select)

Recommender Questions

Please answer the following questions and provide specific examples where possible.

Evaluative Questions

1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (50 words) (textbox)

2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples. (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths? (500 words) (textbox)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (500 words) (textbox)

4. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know? (textbox)

INSTRUCTIONS

Choosing Your Endorser

You are required to submit one EQ Endorsement with your application. A second EQ Endorsement is optional, but not required.
Your EQ Endorsement must come from your current supervisor. If you cannot include an endorsement from your current supervisor, you must provide an explanation in the online application.
Should you submit a second EQ Endorsement, it may come from someone who knows you professionally and/or personally.
EQ Endorsements should come from individuals who can objectively assess your potential for success in NYU Stern’s MBA program and in your future career, and who can act as a persuasive advocate of your EQ strengths.
Immediate family members should not write your EQ endorsement.
Submitting more than two EQ endorsements is not encouraged but is allowed. Please carefully consider whether additional endorsements add significant value and a new and unique perspective to your application.

Your endorsers may answer these questions in the endorsement form or by uploading a Word or PDF document.

EQ endorsements must be submitted online.

If your endorser cannot submit an online endorsement, you must email admchair@stern.nyu.edu to explain the circumstances and request approval for your endorser to submit a paper endorsement.
If your endorser cannot complete an endorsement in English, they will need to follow the instructions above and have the endorsement translated into English through a certified English translation service. Upon submitting the endorsement, your endorser must include the original letter and the translated copy. Applications that only include the translated copy may be made incomplete. Endorsers can upload these documents directly to the application as a single pdf via the link provided, or they may email the original endorsement and translated copy to admchair@stern.nyu.edu to be added to the application. Endorsements can only be accepted directly from the endorser.

You are required to submit one EQ Endorsement. A second EQ Endorsement is optional, but not required.

If you are a reapplicant to NYU Stern’s MBA program, you are not required to submit an EQ Endorsement. Your endorsement from the previous cycle that you applied in will be reviewed as a part of your application. Additional EQ endorsements are optional, but not required.

EQ Endorsements should come from individuals who can objectively assess your potential for success in NYU Stern’s MBA program and in your future career, and who can act as a persuasive advocate of your EQ strengths. View details on the EQ Endorsement.

The EQ Endorsements should be completed online. Please provide the names and contact information of endorsers below.

Once you have added your endorser information below, an email will be sent to them with instructions on how to proceed with the online endorsement. If you would like to send a reminder email, click the endorser’s name below and then click the “Send Reminder” button at the bottom of the box to automatically generate a reminder email.

Make sure to have your endorser allow the stern.nyu.edu domain to ensure receipt of our notification. If your endorser is having difficulty accessing your endorsement using their company email address, have your endorser provide you with their personal email address. Then use that personal email address to create and send a new endorsement request from the application.

For those endorsers who wish to submit their endorsement on paper or who require a translation, you must contact NYU Stern MBA Admissions via email at admchair@stern.nyu.edu for prior approval.

QUESTIONS

EQ Endorsements

  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Organization
  • Title
  • Relationship
  • Phone Number
  • Email
  • Date Submitted
  • Signature
  • Is the applicant currently employed by your organization?:
  • Are you an alumna/alumnus of the NYU Stern School of Business?

EQ Endorsement

Please rate the applicant in relation to his or her peers. (for each skill, select from drop-down menu: outstanding ; excellent ; good ; average ; below average ; unable to judge)

  • Analytical/Quantitative Ability:
  • Oral Communication Skills:
  • Written Communication Skills:
  • Initiative:
  • Integrity:
  • Leadership:
  • Maturity:
  • Teamwork:
  • Professionalism:
  • Emotional Intelligence (EQ):

Please mark your overall recommendation regarding this applicant’s admission to NYU Stern: (select)

1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (Up to 50 words) (textbox)

2. How does the applicant’s performance compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles (if applicable)? Please provide specific examples. (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (Up to 500 words) (textbox)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Up to 500 words) (textbox)

4. IQ+EQ is a core value of NYU Stern, and we seek exceptional individuals who possess both intellectual and interpersonal strengths. Emotional intelligence (EQ) skills such as self-awareness, empathy, communication and self-management are at the core of our community of leaders. Please provide one specific and compelling example to demonstrate the applicant’s emotional intelligence. (textbox)

5. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know? (textbox)

(upload file)

INSTRUCTIONS

What to submit

This is your chance to let someone else tell us how great you are! Please solicit two letters of recommendation for your MBA application.
One recommendation from your current direct supervisor (or next best alternative) at work
One recommendation from someone else who has supervised your work
Notify your recommenders which type of letter of recommendation they will be completing for you (Current Direct Supervisor or Other) and in which round you will be applying.

We do not allow letters of recommendation from family members and current or former direct reports.

Your recommenders must be the sole authors of your letters of recommendation. Drafting, writing, translating, or submitting your own recommendations, or having any outside party review or edit them, even if asked to do so by a recommender, is a violation of our application terms. You are responsible for informing your recommenders of this policy.

Technical advice: Please ask your recommenders to set their email filters to allow emails from @stanford.edu and @gsb.stanford.edu.

How to submit

Your recommenders are required to submit their letters through our online form by the deadline of the round in which you apply. Register your recommenders by clicking the Add Recommender button below.
Provide the name and contact information of each person who will be recommending you. Check the email address for each recommender carefully. You cannot change it later. If there is an error, Exclude the recommender and add their information again. It is essential that you enter the recommender’s email address correctly so that your recommender can access the instructions and recommendation form.
Read the waiver statement for each letter of recommendation and determine whether or not you will waive your right to review each recommendation. You cannot change this later.
Click on the Send to Recommender button. We will send an email to the recommender with instructions on how to proceed. Check with your recommender to make sure they receive it.
Your recommender completes and submits their recommendation.
You and your recommender receive an email confirming the recommendation has been submitted.
You can check the status of your letters of recommendation anytime by logging in to your application or your applicant status portal once you have submitted your application. Your recommenders must submit their letters of recommendation through an online form. They may not email, mail, or fax letters of recommendation. Both letters of recommendation must be submitted by the deadline of the round in which you apply.

Ready to submit your application? Wait! Read this first.

You will not be able to submit your application until you have notified two recommenders.
You don’t have to wait until both letters are in before submitting your application. Go ahead and submit when you are ready, but remember to follow up and make sure your recommenders submit their letters by the deadline.
If a recommender hasn’t submitted a letter yet and you would like to remind them, click on the recommender’s record and then click Remind Recommender.
If you need to change recommenders after notifying two, you must first exclude a recommender by clicking on their name, then clicking on Exclude. You will then be able to add a new recommender.

Your letters of recommendation should provide specific examples and anecdotes that illustrate what you have done and how you have done it.

We require two letters of recommendation: one recommendation from your current direct supervisor (or next best alternative) at work and one recommendation from someone else who has supervised you. We do not allow letters of recommendation from family members and current or former direct reports.

Both letters of recommendation must be submitted by the deadline of the round in which you apply. You must not have read or had any involvement in the drafting, writing, translation, or submission of the letters, including having any outside party review or edit the letters before they are submitted.

First Recommendation

Current Direct Supervisor or Next Best Alternative
You must obtain at least one recommendation from your current direct supervisor. We understand, however, that you may be in a situation that prevents you from providing a recommendation from your current direct supervisor. For example, you may:

Be self-employed
Work for a family business in which a family member is your supervisor
Have begun a new position where your direct supervisor does not know you well
Have not notified your direct supervisor that you are applying to business school
Be a student
If you are unable to provide a letter from your current direct supervisor, use your judgment in finding an alternative source for your recommendation: a previous supervisor, an indirect manager, a client, a member of your board of directors, or any other individual who supervises your work.

If you don’t have full-time work experience, you may use a direct supervisor from a summer, part-time, or internship position. Alternatively, you may ask someone who managed you in an extracurricular, research, volunteer, or community activity.

Second Recommendation

Someone Else Who Has Supervised You
The strongest recommendations typically come from your workplace. You may select a recommendation from your professional, community, or extracurricular experiences. Having two recommendations from the same organization is fine. We recognize that work environments are fluid, so we give you the option of choosing the individual who can best represent your potential impact.

Choosing Your Recommenders

We are impressed by what a recommendation letter says, not by the title or background of the individual who wrote it or the writing skills of the recommender. You should choose individuals who:

Know you well through significant, direct involvement with you within the last three years
Will provide detailed anecdotes and examples to support their assertions
Are sufficiently enthused to spend time writing a thoughtful letter

Deferred Enrollment

If you are currently a full-time student, we encourage you to select recommenders who have supervised your extracurricular activities or work, such as internships or part-time jobs

QUESTIONS

Recommender Information

  • First Name (Given)
  • Last Name (Family)
  • Organization
  • Job Title
  • Location
  • Country
  • City
  • Phone

May we contact you at work regarding this applicant? Yes/No

Additional Details

How long have you known the applicant? (select)

During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant?
From:
To:

You have been registered by the applicant as providing this type of Letter of Recommendation.
Current Direct Supervisor
Other

Are/were you the applicant’s direct supervisor?
Yes
No

Comment briefly on the context of your interaction with the applicant. If applicable, describe the applicant’s role in your organization. (textbox, 320 characters)

[] I used a translator. (check)

If you are a Stanford GSB alumna/alumnus, enter your degree class year. If you are not, leave blank. ___________________
How many candidates are you recommending to Stanford GSB this year? ___________________

Leadership Assessment

Listed below you will find a number of competencies that contribute to successful leadership. Within each category, mark the one button corresponding to the behavior that the candidate most typically exhibits. We acknowledge that all candidates have both areas of strength and areas of development. If you select the highest rating, provide specific examples in your letter.

Initiative

No basis for judgment
Reluctant to take on new tasks; waits to be told what to do; defers to others
Willing to step in and take charge when required to do so
Takes charge spontaneously when problem needs attention
Volunteers for new work challenges; proactively puts in extra effort to accomplish critical or difficult tasks
Proactively seeks high-impact projects; steps up to challenges even when things are not going well

Results Orientation

No basis for judgment
Focuses on fulfilling activities at hand; unsure how work relates to goals
Takes actions to overcome obstacles to achieve goals
Independently acts to exceed goals and plans for contingencies
Documents activities and outcomes to learn from past; introduces incremental improvements to raise the effectiveness of team
Invents new approaches with measurably better results; works to deliver best-in-class performance improvements

Communication, Professional Impression & Poise

No basis for judgment
Struggles to get point across; neglects to understand audience’s input or perspective; lacks confidence and gets flustered under pressure
Works to get point across; acknowledges feedback; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; speaks politely; remains composed in known circumstances
Presents views clearly and logically structures content for a broad audience; listens and responds to feedback; prepares in advance to appear confident; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently in unfamiliar situations
Uses tailored language that appeals to specific groups; restates what others have said to check for understanding; comes across as confident; responds rapidly and strongly to crisis; looked to for advice and guidance
Maintains composure when challenged; solicits opinions and concerns, discusses them openly and adjusts communication; when in strong conflict or crisis, remains cool under pressure; channels strong emotion into positive action

Influence and Collaboration

No basis for judgment
Does not seek input and perspective of others
Accepts input from others and engages them in problem solving
Seeks first to understand perspectives of others; takes actions to gain their support for ideas and initiatives
Uses tailored approaches to connect with others, influence, and achieve results
Uses tailored influence approaches to create and leverage a network of strategically chosen individuals to improve collective outcomes

Respect for Others

No basis for judgment
Unwilling to acknowledge others’ points of view
Open to considering others’ views when confronted or offered
Invites input from others because of expressed respect for them and their views
Praises people publicly for their good actions; ensures that others’ opinions are heard before their own
Uses empathy and personal experience to resolve conflicts and foster mutual respect; reinforces respect with public praise when individuals solicit and use input from others

Team Leadership

No basis for judgment
Struggles to delegate effectively (e.g. micromanages); does not organize activities or provide appropriate information to complete tasks
Assigns tasks and tells people what to do; checks when they are done
Solicits ideas and perspectives from the team; structures activities; holds members accountable
Actively engages the team to develop plans and resolve issues through collaboration; shows the impact of individual/team contributions
Recruits others into duties or roles based on insight into individual abilities; rewards those who exceed expectations; provides strong organizational support

Developing Others

No basis for judgment
Focuses only on own growth; critical of others’ efforts to develop
Encourages people to develop; points out mistakes to help people develop and praises them for improvements
Gives specific positive and negative behavioral feedback to support the development of others
Provides overarching practical guiding principles and recommendations that are applicable in multiple situations to direct or focus efforts on specific areas of development
Identifies potential in others; inspires others to develop by providing feedback, mentoring/coaching, and identifying new growth opportunities as well as supporting their effort to change

Trustworthiness/ Integrity

No basis for judgment
Follows the crowd; takes path of least resistance; gives in under pressure
Acts consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs when it is easy to do so
Acts spontaneously and consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs despite opposition
Initiates actions based on values or beliefs even though the actions may come with reputational risk; demonstrates the values of the team or organization publicly
Demonstrates high personal integrity even at personal cost; holds people accountable to the team or organizational values

Adaptability/ Resilience

No basis for judgment
Prefers existing ways of doing things; fears failure; becomes anxious under challenging situations
Adapts to new methods and procedures when required to do so; remains calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
Champions adoption of new initiatives and processes; exhibits calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
Seeks out disruptions as an opportunity for improvement; remains optimistic and forward-looking in difficult situations that may result in failure
Energized by projects with high uncertainty but potential for high reward; seeks to be the first into unknown or unfamiliar situations; welcomes learning opportunities created by failure; learns from mistakes and rebounds quickly from setbacks

Self Awareness

No basis for judgment
Lacks awareness of how they are perceived; denies or offers excuses when confronted
Acknowledges fault or performance problem when confronted with concrete example or data
Describes own key strengths and weaknesses accurately; welcomes feedback from others and discusses opportunities to change with select individuals
Actively seeks out feedback to explicitly address desired improvement areas or build on strengths; explores reasons for problems openly, including own faults
Seeks out challenging and potentially risky experiences to improve; identifies and engages with resources – people, processes, or content – to maximize strengths or mitigate weaknesses

Problem Solving

No basis for judgment
Avoids problems; when faced with problems, sticks to what worked before, or chooses an obvious path
Offers solutions when the risk is low; focuses on immediate, short-term implications instead of the big picture
Looks beyond the obvious; identifies and focuses on the critical information needed to understand a problem, identifies root cause(s), and comes up with reasonable solutions
Gathers and analyzes key information using complex methods or several layers deep; integrates perspectives from a variety of sources to arrive at unexpected but practical and effective solutions
Applies logic to break complex problems down into manageable parts or sub-problems; solves tough and interconnected problems and can explain how the pieces are connected

Strategic Orientation

No basis for judgment
Focuses on completing work without understanding implications
Understands immediate issues or implications of work or analysis
Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have improved near-term business performance
Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have shaped team/organization strategy and will have impact on long-term business performance
Develops insights or recommendations beyond area of responsibility with impact on long-term business strategy and performance

Feel free to comment if you need to clarify the ratings you have assigned. (textbox, 500 characters)

Summary

  • Based on your professional experience, how would you rate this candidate compared to their peer group? (select)
  • Overall, I (select)

Recommendation Questions

The most helpful recommendations provide detailed descriptions, candid anecdotes, and specific evidence that highlight the candidate’s behavior, actions, and impact on those around them. This kind of information helps distinguish the very best individuals from a pool of many well-qualified candidates. Write your answers to the following questions in a separate document and submit it through our online form.

Questions:

1. How does the applicant’s performance compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Provide specific examples. – Up to 500 words

2. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. – Up to 500 words

3. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know?

Do not include graphics or icons such as company letterhead.

Save your recommendation form before uploading your document by clicking on the Save for Later button below. To upload your document:
Click on the Choose File or Browse button.
Locate your document and click on Open in the pop-up window.
Once uploaded, the name of your document will appear to the right of the Choose File or Browse button.

Upload Letter of Recommendation

INSTRUCTIONS

Why We’re Asking
Recommendations are an important window into understanding your professional impact and how you lead and collaborate within an organizational setting. They are a way for us to gain additional perspective on your candidacy from people who have worked with you and who know you well.

Who Should Write Your Recommendations
Unless you are applying as an undergraduate student, your two recommendations should be professional in nature. We strongly recommend that one of your recommendations come from a current supervisor. However, we know that sometimes this is not possible, and you will have an opportunity to explain your choice of recommenders in the Work Experience section if neither of your recommendations comes from someone who currently supervises you.

Undergraduate students applying to the Silver Scholars Program must provide one letter from an academic instructor and one letter from a professional experience. More detail can be found here.

While all letters must be written in English, we encourage you to find recommenders who can best speak to your past experiences, regardless of their English language fluency. We will evaluate only the substance of the recommendations, not the proficiency of the language used therein. Your recommenders may choose to write their letters in English or to write in their native language and use one of many free translation programs available.

Once you have entered the required recommender information, click the “Send to Recommender” button to email the online recommendation form to your recommender.

To ensure the objectivity and independence of your recommendations, the written product must be entirely the work of your recommenders. Although you may discuss the recommendations with them, you may not have any involvement in drafting or submitting your letters of recommendation. We know that your recommenders are busy, and they may ask your assistance in drafting a letter for their review. Please resist this pressure and ask someone else instead. An authentic letter coming from an individual who is familiar with your work will always be the better option than a letter that was not wholly written by an independent source, even if that person is your current supervisor.

QUESTIONS

Recommender Information

  • First (Given) Name
  • Middle Name
  • Last (Family) Name/Surname
  • Current Organization
  • Current Position/Title
  • Address
  • Country
  • Street
  • City
  • State
  • Postal Code
  • Telephone number (including country code)
  • Email Address
  • Did you graduate from the Yale School of Management?
  • Context of Relationship
  • Nature of relationship
  • Did you use a translator or translation program?

Leadership Assessment

In this section, you will find 12 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories:

– Achievement
– Influence
– People
– Personal Qualities
– Cognitive Abilities

For each competency, please select the one button that corresponds to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid and honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.

Achievement

1. Initiative: Acts ahead of need/anticipates problems

No basis for judgment
Reluctant to take on new tasks; waits to be told what to do; defers to others
Willing to step in and take charge when required to do so
Takes charge spontaneously when problem needs attention
Volunteers for new work challenges; proactively puts in extra effort to accomplish critical or difficult tasks
Proactively seeks high-impact projects; steps up to challenges even when things are not going well

2. Results Orientation: Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement

No basis for judgment
Focuses on fulfilling activities at hand; unsure how work relates to goals
Takes actions to overcome obstacles to achieve goals
Independently acts to exceed goals and plans for contingencies
Documents activities and outcomes to learn from past; introduces incremental improvements to raise the effectiveness of team
Invents new approaches with measurably better results; works to deliver best-in-class performance improvements

Influence

3. Communication, Professional Impression & Poise: Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm and measured even in time of crisis or conflict

No basis for judgment
Struggles to get point across; neglects to understand audience’s input or perspective; lacks confidence and gets flustered under pressure
Works to get point across; acknowledges feedback; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; speaks politely; remains composed in known circumstances
Present views clearly and logically structures content for a broad audience; listens and responds to feedback; prepares in advance to appear confident; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently in unfamiliar situations
Uses tailored language that appeals to specific groups; restates what others have said to check for understanding; comes across as confident; responds rapidly and strongly to crisis; looked to for advice and guidance
Structures content for senior-level meetings; maintains composure when challenged; solicits opinions and concerns, discusses them openly and adjusts communication; remains cool under pressure during conflict or crisis; channels emotion into positive action

4. Influence and Collaboration: Engages and works with people over whom one has no direct control

No basis for judgment
Does not seek input and perspective of others
Accepts input from others and engages them in problem solving
Seeks first to understand perspectives of others; takes actions to gain their support for ideas and initiatives
Uses tailored approaches to connect with others, influence, and achieve results
Uses tailored influence approaches to create and leverage a network of strategically chosen individuals to improve collective outcomes

People

5. Respect for Others: Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions

No basis for judgment
Unwilling to acknowledge others’ points of view
Open to considering others’ views when confronted or offered
Invites input from others because of expressed respect for them and their views
Praises people publicly for their good actions; ensures that others’ opinions are heard before their own
Uses empathy and personal experience to resolve conflicts and foster mutual respect; reinforces respect with public praise when individuals solicit and use input from others

6. Team Leadership: Manages and empowers a team of formal or informal direct reports, including virtual teams

No basis for judgment
Struggles to delegate effectively (e.g. micromanages); does not organize activities or provide appropriate information to complete tasks
Assigns tasks and tells people what to do; checks when they are done
Solicits ideas and perspectives from the team; structures activities; holds members accountable
Actively engages the team to develop plans and resolve issues through collaboration; shows the impact of individual/team contributions
Recruits others into duties or roles based on insight into individual abilities; rewards those who exceed expectations; provides strong organizational support

7. Developing Others: Helps people develop their performance and ability over time

No basis for judgment
Focuses only on one’s own growth; critical of others’ efforts to develop
Encourages people to develop; points out mistakes to help people develop and praises them for improvements
Gives specific positive and negative behavioral feedback to support the development of others
Provides overarching practical guiding principles and recommendations that are applicable in multiple situations to direct or focus efforts on specific areas of development
Identifies potential in others; inspires others to develop by providing feedback, mentoring/coaching, and identifying new growth opportunities as well as supporting their effort to change

Personal Qualities

8. Trustworthiness/ Integrity: Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs or intentions

No basis for judgment
Follows the crowd; takes path of least resistance; gives in under pressure
Acts consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs when it is easy to do so
Acts spontaneously and consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs despite opposition
Initiates actions based on values or beliefs even though the actions may come with reputational risk; demonstrates the values of the team or organization publicly
Demonstrates high personal integrity even at personal cost; holds people accountable to the team or organizational values

9. Adaptability/ Resilience: Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure

No basis for judgment
Prefers existing ways of doing things; fears failure; becomes anxious under challenging situations
Adapts to new methods and procedures when required to do so; remains calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
Champions adoption of new initiatives and processes; exhibits level-headedness in most environments including challenging ones; persists until obstacle is overcome
Seeks out disruptions as an opportunity for improvement; remains optimistic and forward-looking in difficult situations that may result in failure
Energized by projects with high uncertainty but potential for high reward; seeks to be the first into unknown or unfamiliar situations; welcomes learning opportunities created by failure; learns from mistakes and rebounds quickly from setbacks

10. Self Awareness: Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses

No basis for judgment
Lacks awareness of how he/she is perceived; denies or offers excuses when confronted
Acknowledges fault or performance problem when confronted with concrete example or data
Describes own key strengths and weaknesses accurately; welcomes feedback from others and discusses opportunities to change with select individuals
Actively seeks out feedback to explicitly address desired improvement areas or build on strengths; explores reasons for problems openly, including own faults
Seeks out challenging and potentially risky experiences to improve; identifies and engages with resources—people, processes, or content—to maximize strengths or mitigate weaknesses

Cognitive

11. Problem Solving: Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution

No basis for judgment
Avoids problems; when faced with problems, sticks to what worked before, or chooses an obvious path
Offers solutions when the risk is low; focuses on immediate, short-term implications instead of the big picture
Looks beyond the obvious; identifies and focuses on the critical information needed to understand a problem, identifies root cause(s), and comes up with reasonable solutions
Gathers and analyzes key information using complex methods or several layers deep; integrates perspectives from a variety of sources to arrive at unexpected but practical and effective solutions
Applies logic to break complex problems down into manageable parts or sub-problems; solves tough and interconnected problems and can explain how the pieces are connected

12. Strategic Orientation: Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work

No basis for judgment
Focuses on completing work without understanding implications
Understands immediate issues or implications of work or analysis
Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have improved near-term business performance
Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have shaped team/organization strategy and will have impact on long-term business performance
Develops insights or recommendations beyond area of responsibility with impact on long-term business strategy and performance

Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to her/his peer group? (select)

Overall, I … (select)

Letter of Recommendation

Please write an assessment of the applicant that addresses the prompts below. We are looking for your candid and accurate assessment of the applicant’s potential to be a successful leader and the specific traits the applicant possesses that evidence this potential. Please be as specific as possible and use concrete examples where applicable. Do not incorporate anything drafted by the candidate in your recommendation or have the candidate submit the recommendation on your behalf.

Please note that letters of recommendation must be written in English. If English is not your native language, rest assured that your applicant will not be at a disadvantage. We welcome you to write your letter in English regardless of your level of proficiency, or to write in your native language and use a translator or one of many free translation programs available. If you have used a translator or translation program, please indicate that above.

1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (Recommended word count: 50 words)

2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (Recommended word count: 500 words)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Recommended word count: 500 words)

4. Are you in a position to know whether the applicant is sponsored for the MBA by his or her current employer? If so, please comment.

5. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know?

Upload a PDF or Word document here.